Hyper Estraier @ www.gnu.org

Results of 0 - 1 of about 0 (0.000 sec.)

ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.po: @digest: 182956ed480675e989ba45b880e3cc08; @id: 261871; @mdate: 2022-11-12T21:06:15Z; @size: 10526; @type: text/html; content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8; #keywords: 亞馬 (25139), 馬遜 (24539), 28wrong (18928), 遜的 (12397), bostonreview (11364), 為< (9447), hypothetically (7757), 用者 (6191), ebooks (5749), 子書 (5435), prosecuted (4960), possessing (4332), 電子 (4195), 非自 (4191), 軟體 (3989), theguardian (3972), swindle (3210), 我們 (3168), defectivebydesign (3000), orwellian (3000), 由軟 (2961), 翻譯 (2955), constrain (2785), 使用 (2757), kindle (2623), rdquo (2544), ldquo (2416), 者的 (2175), accustomed (2017), anonymously (1995), amazon (1924), technology (1799); ebooks-must-increase-freedom.zh-tw.po Mismatched links: 12. Mismatched ids: 0. # text 3 | by <a href="http{+s+}://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a> by <a href=" https://www.stallman.org/ ">Richard Stallman</a> 作者為 <a href=" http://www.stallman.org/ ">Richard Stallman</a> 6 | Many other habits that we readers are accustomed to are “not | allowed” for e-books. With the Amazon “Kindle” (for | which <a | href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">“Swindle”</a> | is a more fitting name), to take one example, users can't buy a book | anonymously with cash. “Kindle” books are typically available | from Amazon only, and Amazon makes users identify themselves. Thus, Amazon | knows exactly which books each user has read. In a country such as the UK, | where you can be <a | href="http{+s+}://www.stallman.org/archives/2012-mar-jun.html#07_April_2012_%28Wrong_book%29">prosecuted | for possessing a forbidden book</a>, this is more than hypothetically | Orwellian. Many other habits that we readers are accustomed to are “not allowed” for e-books. With the Amazon “Kindle” (for which <a href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">“Swindle”</a> is a more fitting name), to take one example, users can't buy a book anonymously with cash. “Kindle” books are typically available from Amazon only, and Amazon makes users identify themselves. Thus, Amazon knows exactly which books each user has read. In a country such as the UK, where you can be <a href=" https://www.stallman.org/archives/2012-mar-jun.html#07_April_2012_%28Wrong_book%29 ">prosecuted for possessing a forbidden book</a>, this is more than hypothetically Orwellian. 我們讀者的其他許多習慣在電子書上都是「不被允許的」。像是亞馬遜的 Kindle 閱讀器（也許 <a href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">Swindle</a> 才是比較適合的名字）,舉例來說,使用者不能用現金匿名購買書籍。而 Kindle 的書籍通常也只能在亞馬遜上購買,而亞馬遜讓使用者把自己的身份曝露出來。因此,亞馬遜知道每個使用者讀了哪些書。在如英國這樣的國家,你可能會因為<a href=" http://www.stallman.org/archives/2012-mar-jun.html#07_April_2012_%28Wrong_book%29 ">擁有一本禁書而被起訴</a>,這已經不只是歐威爾主義了。 9 | With software, either the users control the program (making such software | <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">Libre or Free</a>) or the program | controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the | distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only | relationship between the two. The <a | href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">malicious software features</a> | described above are imposed on users via software that's not Libre. If a | Libre program had malicious features like those, some users skilled at | programming would remove them, then provide the corrected version to all | the other users. Users can't change non-Libre software, which makes it <a | [-href="http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer">-] | {+href="https://www.bostonreview.net/forum_response/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer/">+} | an ideal instrument for exercising power over the public</a>. With software, either the users control the program (making such software <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">Libre or Free</a>) or the program controls its users (non-Libre). Amazon's e-book policies imitate the distribution policies of non-Libre software, but that's not the only relationship between the two. The <a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">malicious software features</a> described above are imposed on users via software that's not Libre. If a Libre program had malicious features like those, some users skilled at programming would remove them, then provide the corrected version to all the other users. Users can't change non-Libre software, which makes it <a href=" https://www.bostonreview.net/forum_response/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer/ "> an ideal instrument for exercising power over the public</a>. 以軟體來說,通常是使用者控制軟體（<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">自由軟體</a>）或程式控制使用者（非自由）。亞馬遜的電子政策比較接近非自由軟體,但這不是兩者間的唯一關係。上述的<a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">惡意軟體功能</a>是透過非自由的軟體強加給使用者的。如果自由軟體有類似的惡意功能,那擅於編寫程式的使用者很快就會將其刪除,然後提供修正過的版本給其他使用者。但使用者沒辦法修正非自由軟體,這使其<a href=" http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/protecting-internet-without-wrecking-it/root-problem-software-controlled-its-developer "> 成為對大眾肆意行使權力的理想工具</a>。 11 | <a [-href="http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join-] | {+href="https://www.defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html">Join+} our | mailing list about the dangers of eBooks</a>. <a href=" https://www.defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html ">Join our mailing list about the dangers of eBooks</a>. <a href=" http://defectivebydesign.org/ebooks.html ">加入我們討論電子書危害的郵遞論壇</a>。 19 | [-This-]{+This+} essay was originally published by <cite>The | Guardian</cite>, on 17 April 2012, as “<a | [-href="//www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/apr/17/sharing-ebooks-richard-stallman">Technology-] | {+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/apr/17/sharing-ebooks-richard-stallman">Technology+} | Should Help Us Share, Not Constrain [-Us</a>”,-] {+Us</a>,”+} | with some surprise editing. This version incorporates parts of that | editing while restoring parts of the original [-text.-] {+text.+} This essay was originally published by <cite>The Guardian</cite>, on 17 April 2012, as “<a href=" https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/apr/17/sharing-ebooks-richard-stallman ">Technology Should Help Us Share, Not Constrain Us</a>,” with some surprise editing. This version incorporates parts of that editing while restoring parts of the original text. 本文原先在2012年4月17日發佈於<cite>衛報</cite>,原始標題為 “<a href=" //www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/apr/17/sharing-ebooks-richard-stallman ">Technology Should Help Us Share, Not Constrain Us</a>”,原發佈文章經過編輯。而此版本則保留了部份的編輯,並復原部份的原文。 22 | Please see the <a | href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations | README</a> for information on coordinating and [-submitting-] | {+contributing+} translations of this article. Please see the <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article. 我們努力盡所能提供貼切、品質良善的翻譯。然而,我們無法十全十美,還請將你的意見評述與一般建議寄給 <a href=" mailto:web-translators@gnu.org "><web-translators@gnu.org></a>請參照 <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">翻譯讀我 README</a> 來瞭解協調和提交我們的網頁翻譯相關事宜。 24 This page is licensed under a <a rel="license" href=" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ ">Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>. 本頁面採用<a rel="license" href=" https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.zh_TW ">創用 CC 姓名標示-禁止改作 4.0 國際</a>條款給予授權。 ...; http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/gnun/reports/zh-tw/philosophy/ebooks-must-increase-freedom.html - [detail] - [similar]

PREV NEXT