<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
<title>The GNU Operating System
- GNU project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/gnu/po/gnu.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>The GNU Operating System</h2>

  <li><a href="/gnu/about-gnu.html">About the GNU Operating System</a></li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/gnu-history.html">A historical overview of GNU</a></li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/thegnuproject.html">A more detailed history of GNU</a></li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/initial-announcement.html">The initial announcement</a>
      of the project</li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/manifesto.html">The GNU Manifesto</a></li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/byte-interview.html">BYTE interview with Richard
      Stallman</a> (1986)</li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/rms-lisp.html">My Lisp Experiences and the
       Development of GNU Emacs</a> (by Richard Stallman)</li>
  <li><a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DEFDE123AF932A25752C0A96F948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1">     
      One Man's Fight for Free Software</a>, an article about Richard
      Stallman and the early GNU development, published at <cite>The
      New York Times</cite> on January 11, 1989. One problem with the
      article is that it uses the propaganda term “intellectual
      property” as if that referred to something coherent.  The
      term is such a confusion that talking about it <a
      href="/philosophy/not-ipr.html">makes no sense</a>. The article
      is also somewhat confused in regard to Symbolics.  What Stallman
      did, while still working at MIT, was to write, independently,
      replacement improvements comparable to the improvements that
      Symbolics made in its version of the MIT Lisp Machine
  <li><a href="/philosophy/15-years-of-free-software.html">15 Years
       of Free Software</a> (1999)</li>

<h3><a id="gnulinux"></a>GNU and Linux</h3>

  <li><a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">The href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">Linux and the GNU System</a><br />
      The relationship between GNU and
      Linux</a></li> Linux</li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html">Why the ‘Linux
      system’ should be called GNU/Linux</a></li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/gnu-users-never-heard-of-gnu.html">GNU Users Who
      Have Never Heard of GNU</a></li>
  <li><a href="/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html">A GNU/Linux FAQ</a></li>

<h3><a id="misc"></a>Other GNU-related resources</h3>

  <li><a href="http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group_list">GNU/Linux,
      GNU/Hurd, and free software user groups</a></li>

</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">

<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p>

<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
        replace it with the translation of these two:

        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
        to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">

        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
        our web pages, see <a
        README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>

<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
     document was modified, or published.
     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->

<p>Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>

<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>

<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->

<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2014/01/05 20:59:04 $
<!-- timestamp end -->