<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
<title>Violations of the GNU Licenses
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Violations of the GNU Licenses</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" -->

If you think you see a violation of the GNU
<a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL</a>,
<a href="/licenses/lgpl.html">LGPL</a>,
<a href="/licenses/agpl.html">AGPL</a>, or
<a href="/licenses/fdl.html">FDL</a>,
the first thing you
should do is double-check the facts:</p>
  <li>Does the distribution contain a copy of the License?</li>
  <li>Does it clearly state which software is covered by the License?
       Does it say anything misleading, perhaps giving the impression
       that something is covered by the License when in fact it is not?</li>
  <li>Is source code included in the distribution?</li>
  <li>Is a written offer for source code included with a distribution of
       just binaries?</li>
  <li>Is the available source code complete, or is it designed for
       linking in other non-free modules?</li>
If there seems to be a real violation, the next thing you need to do
is record the details carefully:</p>

<li>the precise name of the product</li>
<li>the name of the person or organization distributing it</li>

<li>email addresses, postal addresses and phone numbers for how to
contact the distributor(s)</li>

<li>the exact name of the package whose license is violated</li>

<li>how the license was violated:
    <li>Is the copyright notice of the copyright holder included?</li>
    <li>Is the source code completely missing?</li>
    <li>Is there a written offer for source that's incomplete in some
    way?  This could happen if it provides a contact address or
    network URL that's somehow incorrect.</li>

    <li>Is there a copy of the license included in the distribution?</li>

    <li>Is some of the source available, but not all?  If so, what parts
        are missing?</li>

The more of these details that you have, the easier it is for the
copyright holder to pursue the matter.</p>

Once you have collected the details, you should send a precise report
to the copyright holder of the packages that are being misused.  The
copyright holder is the one who is legally authorized to take action
to enforce the license.</p>

If the copyright holder <strong>is</strong> the Free Software
Foundation, please send the report to <a
It's important that we be able to write back to you to get more
information about the violation or product.  So, if you use an
anonymous remailer, please provide a return path of some sort. If
you'd like to encrypt your correspondence, just send a brief mail
saying so, and we'll make appropriate arrangements. Because the FSF
endorsed <a
Principles of Community-Oriented GPL Enforcement</a>, you can rest
assured that your report will help to educate the violator rather than
punish them for their mistake.</p>

Note that the GPL, and other copyleft licenses, are copyright licenses.
This means that only the copyright holders are empowered to act against
violations.  The FSF acts on all GPL violations reported on FSF
copyrighted code, and we offer assistance to any other copyright holder
who wishes to do the same.</p>

But, we cannot act on our own if we do not hold copyright.  Thus, be sure
to find out who the copyright holders of the software are before reporting
a violation.</p>

</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
<div class="unprintable">

<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p>

<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
        replace it with the translation of these two:

        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
        to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">

        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
        our web pages, see <a
        README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>

<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
     document was modified, or published.
     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->

<p>Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2017 2017, 2018
Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>

<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>

<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->

<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2018/03/02 06:35:51 $
<!-- timestamp end -->