<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 1.96 -->
<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
<!--#set var="TAGS" value="thirdparty" -->
<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
<title>Applying Copyleft To Non-Software Information
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/nonsoftware-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Applying Copyleft To Non-Software Information</h2>


<address class="byline">by <a href="http://dsl.org/"><strong>Michael Stutz</strong></a></p> href="http://dsl.org/">Michael Stutz</a></address>

<h3 id="what">First, what is Copyleft?</h3>

The entry for
“<a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” in the
definitive hacker lexicon, the
<a href="http://www.jargon.net/jargonfile/c/copyleft.html">Jargon
File</a>, reads:</p>

   copyleft: /kop'ee-left/ [play on ‘copyright’] “copyright”] n. 1. The
   copyright notice (‘General (“General Public License’) License”) carried by
   GNU EMACS and other Free Software Foundation software, granting
   reuse and reproduction rights to all comers (but see also General
   Public Virus).  2. By extension, any copyright notice intended to
   achieve similar aims.

<p>The idea of <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>
originated with über-hacker <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"> href="https://www.stallman.org/">
Richard Stallman</a> in 1983 when he started
the <a href="/gnu/gnu-history.html">GNU Project</a>. In brief, his
goal was “to develop a complete free Unix-like operating
system.” As part of that goal, he invented and wrote
the <a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU href="/licenses/gpl.html">GNU General Public License</a>, a
legal construct that included a copyright notice but added to it (or,
technically, removed certain restrictions), so its terms allowed for
the freedoms of reuse, modification and reproduction of a work or its
derivatives to be kept for all.</p>

Normal <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/planet/carroll/"> href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190805143144/http://www.angelfire.com/planet/carroll/index2.html">
copyright</a> asserts ownership and identification of the author, as
well as prevents the use of the author's name as author of a distorted
version of the work; it also prevents intentional distortion of the
work by others and prevents destruction of the work. But it also
carries other restrictions — such restrictions—such as restricting the
reproduction or modification of a work.</p>

Copyleft contains the normal copyright statement, asserting ownership
and identification of the author. However, it then <em>gives away</em>
some of the other rights implicit in the normal copyright: it says
that not only are you free to redistribute this work, but you are also
free to change the work. However, you cannot claim to have written the
original work, nor can you claim that these changes were created by
someone else. Finally, all derivative works must also be placed under
these terms.</p>

<h3 id="why">Why is Copyleft important, or even necessary?</h3>

Certain restrictions of copyright — such copyright—such as distribution and
modification — are
modification—are not very useful to “cyberia,” the
“free, apolitical, democratic community” that constitutes
the internetworked digital world.</p>

With computers, perfect copies of a digital work can easily be made
— and
made—and even modified, or further distributed — by distributed—by others,
with no loss of the original work. As individuals interact in cyberia,
sharing information — then information—then reacting and building upon it —
is it—is
not only natural, but this is the <em>only</em> way for individual
beings to thrive in a community. In essence, the idea of copyleft is
basic to the natural propagation of digital information among humans
in a society. This is why the regular notion of copyright does not
make sense in the context of cyberia.</p>

Simple ‘public domain’ “public domain” publication will not work, because
some will try to abuse this for profit by depriving others of freedom;
as long as we live in a world with a legal system where legal
abstractions such as copyright are necessary, as responsible artists
or scientists we will need the formal legal abstractions of copyleft
that ensure our freedom and the freedom of others.</p>

Much literature has been written on this subject by Stallman, and the
details can be found in the
excellent <a href="/philosophy/philosophy.html">texts</a> published
by the Free Software Foundation.</p>

<h3 id="gpl">So why isn't the FSF's GNU GPL good enough?</h3>

It <em>is</em> good enough! The GNU GPL is not only a document of
significant historical and literary value, but it is in wide use today
for countless software programs — those programs—those as formal part of the
GNU Project and otherwise. The GNU GPL originated for the specific
goal of sharing software among computer programmers. However, looking
closely at the GPL, it appears that the same License can be easily
applied to non-software information.</p>

<p>Alternately, a document can be copylefted under different, or much
simpler terms; whether or not the GNU GPL is the specific means to the
end is not the issue, although the GNU GPL certainly provides the most
explicit (and canonical) definition of copyleft.</p>

<h3 id="how">Ok, so how do I copyleft my non-software work?</h3>

It's simple. While a particular situation may require or inspire its
own specific License, possibly similar to the GNU GPL, all that a
copyleft notice must really do is fulfill the points as defined above
in “<a href="#what">First, what is Copyleft?</a>”. Copyleft?</a>” Using
the GNU GPL to copyleft your work is easy.</p>

The GNU GPL states that it “applies to any program or other work
which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may
be distributed under the terms of this General Public License,”
so this “Program,” then, may not necessarily be a computer
software program — any program—any work of any nature that can be
copyrighted can be copylefted with the GNU GPL.</p>

The GNU GPL references the “source code” of a work; this
“source code” will mean different things for different
kinds of information, but the definition of “source code”
— provided
code”—provided in the GNU GPL — holds GPL—holds true in any case:
“The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work
for making modifications to it.”</p>

The notices attached to the work can not always be attached “to
the start of each source file,” as recommended by the GNU
GPL. In this case, the directory that the files reside should contain
a notice, as should any accompanying documentation or literature.</p>

Finally, for non-software works the “copyright” line
included at the start of the “source code” of the work is
modified in language slightly:</p>


<blockquote class="emph-box">
    <one line to give the work's name and a brief idea of what it does.> does.><br />
    Copyright (C) yyyy  <name of author>
    This information is free; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
    under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
    the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
    (at your option) any later version.
    This work is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
    GNU General Public License for more details.

    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
    along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software
    Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.

<h3 id="where">Where do I go from here?</h3>

<p>Here are sources for further information on copyleft, especially as
it is applied to non-software information:</p>

<p>The <a href="/home.html">rest of this web site</a> is the home of
the GNU Project and is the canonical source for copyleft and
freely-redistributable software.</p>
free software<a href="#f1">(1)</a>.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.ram.org/">Ram Samudrala</a> wrote
the <a href="http://www.ram.org/ramblings/philosophy/fmp.html">Free
Music Philosophy</a> and creates copylefted music as the
band Twisted Helices.</p>

<p>Some of my own non-software copylefted works include texts
(literature, reviews, <a href="http://dsl.org/cookbook/cookbook_toc.html">technical</a>)
and music.</p>
<div class="column-limit"></div>

<h3 id="fn" class="footnote">Footnote</h3>
<li id="f1">Before 2020, “free software” was confusingly
referred to as “freely-redistributable.”</li>

</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer"> id="footer" role="contentinfo">
<div class="unprintable">

<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p>

<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
        replace it with the translation of these two:

        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
        to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">

        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting contributing translations of
        our web pages, see <a
        README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting contributing translations
of this article.</p>

<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
     document was modified, or published.
     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->

<p>Copyright © 1997 1997, 2020 Michael Stutz</p>

Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is
permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.

<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->

<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2021/09/26 11:03:20 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->