<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 1.84 -->
<!-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Please do not edit lists with items such as <li id="Mnnnnnnnn">!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-->
<title>Microsoft's Software Is Malware
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.translist" -->
<style type="text/css" media="print,screen">
<!--
#content div.toc li { list-style: none; margin-bottom: 1em; }
#content div.toc { margin-top: 1em; }
-->
</style>
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->

<h2>Microsoft's Software is Malware</h2>

<p><a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">Other examples of proprietary
malware</a></p>

<div class="highlight-para"> class="comment">
<p>
<em>Malware</em> means software designed to function in ways that
mistreat or harm the user.  (This does not include accidental errors.)
This page explains how Microsoft software is malware.
</p>

<p>
Malware and nonfree software are two different issues.  The difference
between <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> and
nonfree software is in
<a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">
whether the users have control of the program or vice versa</a>.  It's
not directly a question of what the program <em>does</em> when it
runs.  However, in practice nonfree software is often malware,
because the developer's awareness that the users would be powerless to fix
any malicious functionalities tempts the developer to impose some.
</p>
</div>

<div class="toc"> class="important" style="margin-bottom: 2em">
<p>If you know of an example that ought to be in this page but isn't
here, please write
to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>
to inform us. Please include the URL of a trustworthy reference or two
to serve as specific substantiation.</p>
</div>
</div>

<div class="malfunctions"> class="summary">
<h3>Type of malware</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Type of malware</strong></li>
  <li><a href="#back-doors">Back doors</a></li>
<!--<li><a href="#censorship">Censorship</a></li>-->
  <li><a href="#insecurity">Insecurity</a></li>
<li><a href="#sabotage">Sabotage</a></li>
<li><a href="#interference">Interference</a></li>
<li><a href="#surveillance">Surveillance</a></li>
<li><a href="#drm">Digital restrictions
    management</a> or “DRM” means functionalities “DRM”—functionalities designed
    to restrict what users can do with the data in their computers.</li>
  <li><a href="#insecurity">Insecurity</a></li>
  <li><a href="#interference">Interference</a></li>
  <li><a href="#jails">Jails</a>—systems
    that impose censorship on application programs.</li>
  <li><a href="#sabotage">Sabotage</a></li>
  <li><a href="#subscriptions">Subscriptions</a></li>
  <li><a href="#surveillance">Surveillance</a></li>
  <li><a href="#tyrants">Tyrants</a>—systems
    that reject any operating system not “authorized” by the
    manufacturer.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>

<h3 id="back-doors">Microsoft Back Doors</h3>
<ul>
  <li><p><a href="https://theintercept.com/2015/12/28/recently-bought-a-windows-computer-microsoft-probably-has-your-encryption-key/">
  Microsoft has already backdoored its disk encryption</a>.</p></li>

  <li><p>Microsoft

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M201608172">
    <p id="windows-update">Microsoft
    Windows has a universal back door through which <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201806263">
    href="http://www.informationweek.com/microsoft-updates-windows-without-user-permission-apologizes/d/d-id/1059183">
    any change whatsoever can be imposed on the users</a>.</p>

  <p>More information on when

    <p>This was <a
    href="http://slated.org/windows_by_stealth_the_updates_you_dont_want">
  this was used</a>.</p>
    reported in 2007</a> for XP and Vista, and it seems
    that Microsoft used the same method to push the <a
    href="/proprietary/malware-microsoft.html#windows10-forcing">
    Windows 10 downgrade</a> to computers running Windows 7 and 8.</p>

    <p>In Windows 10, the universal back door
    is no longer hidden; all “upgrades” will be <a href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/07/windows-10-updates-to-be-automatic-and-mandatory-for-home-users/">forcibly
    href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/07/windows-10-updates-to-be-automatic-and-mandatory-for-home-users/">
    forcibly and immediately imposed</a>.</p></li>

  <li><p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2500036/desktop-apps/microsoft--we-can-remotely-delete-windows-8-apps.html"> imposed</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201512280">
    <p>Microsoft has <a
    href="https://theintercept.com/2015/12/28/recently-bought-a-windows-computer-microsoft-probably-has-your-encryption-key/">
    backdoored its disk encryption</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201308230">
    <p>The German government <a
    href="http://drleonardcoldwell.com/leaked-german-government-warns-key-entities-not-to-use-windows-8-linked-to-nsa/">veers
    away from Windows 8 computers with TPM 2.0</a>, due to potential back
    door capabilities of the TPM 2.0 chip.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201307300">
    <p>Here is a suspicion that
    we can't prove, but is worth thinking about: <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150206003913/http://www.afr.com/p/technology/intel_chips_could_be_nsa_key_to_ymrhS1HS1633gCWKt5tFtI">
    Writable microcode for Intel and AMD microprocessors</a> may be a
    vehicle for the NSA to invade computers, with the help of Microsoft,
    say respected security experts.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201112081">
    <p>Windows 8 also has a back door for <a
    href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2500036/desktop-apps/microsoft--we-can-remotely-delete-windows-8-apps.html">
    remotely deleting apps</a>.</p>

    <p>You might well decide to let a security service that you trust
    remotely <em>deactivate</em> programs that it considers malicious.
    But there is no excuse for <em>deleting</em> the programs, and you
    should have the right to decide who whom (if anyone) to trust in this way.</p></li>

  <li><p>Windows 8's back doors are so gaping that <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160310201616/http://drleonardcoldwell.com/2013/08/23/leaked-german-government-warns-key-entities-not-to-use-windows-8-linked-to-nsa/">
  the German government has decided it can't be trusted</a>.</p></li>

<li><p>Users reported that <a 
    href="http://www.networkworld.com/article/2993490/windows/windows-10-upgrades-reportedly-appearing-as-mandatory-for-some-users.html#tk.rss_all">
    Microsoft was forcing them to replace Windows 7 and 8 with all-spying 
    Windows 10</a>.</p>

    <p>Microsoft was
    way.</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<h3 id="drm">Microsoft DRM</h3>

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M200708131">
    <p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/2007/08/aacs-tentacles/">DRM
    in fact <a 
    href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/3012278/microsoft-windows/microsoft-sets-stage-for-massive-windows-10-upgrade-strategy.html">
    attacking computers that run Windows 7 and 8</a>, switching on a flag 
    that said whether Windows</a>, introduced to “upgrade” cater to Windows 10 when users 
    had turned it off.</p>

    <p>Later on, Microsoft published instructions on <a 
    href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/01/microsoft-finally-has-a-proper-way-to-opt-out-of-windows-78-to-windows-10-upgrades/">
    href="/proprietary/proprietary-drm.html#bluray">Bluray</a> disks. 
    (The article talks about how to permanently reject the downgrade to Windows 10</a>.</p>

    <p>This seems to involve use of a back door same malware would later be
    introduced in Windows 7 and 8.</p> MacOS.  That had not been done at the time, but it was
    done subsequently.)</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<h3 id="insecurity">Microsoft Insecurity</h3>

<ul>
    <li><p>A <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-attack-can-steal-your-username-password-and-other-logins/">flaw in Internet

<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file
  they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the
  supposition that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave
  bugs.</p>

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M201705120">
    <p>Exploits of bugs in Windows, which were developed by the NSA
    and then leaked by the Shadowbrokers group, are now being used to <a
    href="https://theintercept.com/2017/05/12/the-nsas-lost-digital-weapon-is-helping-hijack-computers-around-the-world/">attack
    a great number of Windows computers with ransomware</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201608020">
    <p>A <a
    href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-attack-can-steal-your-username-password-and-other-logins/">flaw
    in Internet Explorer and Edge</a> allows an attacker to retrieve
    Microsoft account credentials, if the user is tricked into visiting
    a malicious link.</p>
  </li>
<li>

  <li id="M201312040">
    <p><a
    href="http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/12/credit-card-fraud-comes-of-age-with-first-known-point-of-sale-botnet/">
    Point-of-sale terminals running Windows were taken over over</a> and
    turned into a botnet for the purpose of collecting customers' credit
    card
numbers</a>.
</p> numbers.</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<h3 id="sabotage">Microsoft Sabotage</h3>

<p>The wrongs in this section are not precisely malware, since they do
not involve making the program that runs in a way that hurts id="interference">Microsoft Interference</h3>

<p>Various proprietary programs often mess up the user.
But they user's system. They
are a lot like malware, since sabotage, but they are technical Microsoft
actions that harm not grave enough to qualify for the users word
“sabotage”. Nonetheless, they are nasty and wrong. This
section describes examples of specific Microsoft software.</p>

<ul>
  <li><p>Once Microsoft has tricked a user into accepting installation committing interference.</p>

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M201809120">
    <p>One version of Windows
   10, 10 <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/01/windows_10_nagware_no_way_out/">they
   find that
    href="https://www.ghacks.net/2018/09/12/microsoft-intercepting-firefox-chrome-installation-on-windows-10/">
    harangues users if they are denied the option try to cancel or even postpone the
   imposed date of installation</a>.
   </p>
   <p>This demonstrates what we've said for years: using proprietary
   software means letting someone have power over you, and you're
   going install Firefox (or Chrome)</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201803190">
    <p>Microsoft is planning to get screwed sooner or later.</p></li>

  <li><p>Microsoft
  has make Windows <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2016/1/16/10780876/microsoft-windows-support-policy-new-processors-skylake">desupported
  all future Intel CPUs for
    href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/19/windows-10-microsoft-force-people-edge-browser-windows-mail-chrome-firefox">
    impose use of its browser, Edge, in certain circumstances</a>.</p>

    <p>The reason Microsoft can force things on users is that Windows 7
    is nonfree.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201703170">
    <p>Windows displays <a
    href="http://www.theverge.com/2017/3/17/14956540/microsoft-windows-10-ads-taskbar-file-explorer">
    intrusive ads for Microsoft products and 8</a>. Those machines will
  be stuck with its partners'
    products</a>.</p>

    <p>The article's author starts from the nastier premise that Microsoft has
    a right to control what Windows 10. does to users, as long as it doesn't
    go “too far”. We disagree.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201608170">
    <p> After <a href="http://gizmodo.com/only-the-latest-version-of-windows-will-run-on-some-fut-1753545825">
  AMD and Qualcomm CPUs, too</a>.
  </p>
  <p>Of course, href="/proprietary/malware-microsoft.html#windows10-forcing">forcing the download of Windows 10</a>
    on computers that were running Windows 7 and 8 are 8, Microsoft <a
    href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/3012278/microsoft-windows/microsoft-sets-stage-for-massive-windows-10-upgrade-strategy.html">
    repeatedly switched on a flag that urged users to
    “upgrade” to Windows 10</a> when they had turned
    it off, in the hope that some day they would fail to say no.
    To do this, Microsoft used <a
    href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/17/microsoft_windows_10_upgrade_gwx_vs_humanity/">
    malware techniques</a>.</p>

    <p>A detailed <a
    href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/08/windows-10-microsoft-blatantly-disregards-user-choice-and-privacy-deep-dive">
    analysis of Microsoft's scheme</a> is available on the Electronic
    Frontier Foundation's website.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201603090">
    <p>Microsoft has made companies'
    Windows machines managed by the company's sysadmins <a
    href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/3042397/microsoft-windows/admins-beware-domain-attached-pcs-are-sprouting-get-windows-10-ads.html">harangue
    users to complain to the sysadmins about not “upgrading”
    to Windows 10</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201601160">
    <p>Microsoft has <a
    href="http://www.theverge.com/2016/1/16/10780876/microsoft-windows-support-policy-new-processors-skylake">desupported
    all future Intel CPUs for Windows 7 and 8</a>. Those
    machines will be stuck with the nastier Windows 10.  <a
    href="http://gizmodo.com/only-the-latest-version-of-windows-will-run-on-some-fut-1753545825">
    AMD and Qualcomm CPUs, too</a>.</p>

    <p>Of course, Windows 7 and 8 are unethical too, because they are
    proprietary software.  But this example of Microsoft's wielding its
    power demonstrates the power it holds.
  </p> holds.</p>

    <p>Free software developers also stop maintaining old versions of
    their programs, but this is not unfair to users because the users of
    free software have control over it.  If it is important enough to you,
    you and other users can hire someone to support the old version on
    your future platforms.
  </p></li>

  <li><p>Microsoft
    is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/woman-wins-10-000-from-microsoft-after-unwanted-window-1782666146">
    forcibly pushing platforms.</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<h3 id="sabotage">Microsoft Sabotage</h3>

<p>The wrongs in this section are not precisely malware, since they do
not involve making the program that runs in a way that hurts the user.
But they are a lot like malware, since they are technical Microsoft
actions that harm the users of specific Microsoft software.</p>

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M201704194">
    <p>Microsoft has made Windows
    update 7
    and 8 cease to its version 10</a>, ignoring the flag function on certain new computers, <a
    href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4012982/the-processor-is-not-supported-together-with-the-windows-version-that">effectively
    forcing their owners to switch to Windows 10</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201704134">
    <p>Microsoft <a
    href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/04/new-processors-are-now-blocked-from-receiving-updates-on-old-windows/">
    has dropped support for Windows 7 or and 8
    that you could set to on recent processors</a>
    in a big hurry.</p>

    <p>It makes no difference what legitimate reasons Microsoft might
    have for not upgrade.  This reaffirms doing work to support them. If it doesn't want to do
    this work, it should let users do the presence work.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201606270">
    <p id="windows10-forcing">In its efforts to trick users of
    a <a href="/proprietary/proprietary-back-doors.html">universal
    back door in Windows</a> Windows
    7 and 8.</p></li>

  <li><p>Windows 8 into installing all-spying Windows 10 “upgrades” <a
      href="http://www.ghacks.net/2015/11/24/beware-latest-windows-10-update-may-remove-programs-automatically/">
      delete applications</a> without asking permission.</p></li>

  <li><p> against their
    will, Microsoft is <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/11/microsoft-downloading-windows-1">
  repeatedly nagging many users forced their computers to install <a
    href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/11/microsoft-downloading-windows-1">
    silently download… the whole of Windows 10</a>.
  </p></li>

<li><p>
Microsoft 10</a>! Apparently,
    this was for months done through a <a
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/02/microsoft-downloading-windows-10-automatic-update">
tricking users
    href="/proprietary/proprietary-back-doors.html#windows-update">
    universal back door</a>. Not only did the unwanted downloads <a
    href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/03/windows_10_upgrade_satellite_link/">
    jeopardize important operations in regions of the world with poor
    connectivity</a>, but many of the people who let installation proceed
    found out that this “upgrade” was in fact a <a
    href="http://gizmodo.com/woman-wins-10-000-from-microsoft-after-unwanted-window-1782666146">
    downgrade</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201606010">
    <p>Once Microsoft has tricked a user
    into “upgrading” to accepting installation of Windows 10</a>, if 10, <a
    href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/01/windows_10_nagware_no_way_out/">they
    find that they
failed are denied the option to notice and say no.
</p></li>

  <li><p><a
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130622044225/http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2013/06/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again/index.htm">
  Microsoft informs cancel or even postpone the NSA
    imposed date of bugs in Windows before fixing them.</a></p></li>

  <li><p><a href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/windows-xp-end-of-an-era-end-of-an-error-3569489/"> installation</a>.</p>

    <p>This demonstrates what we've said for years: using proprietary
    software means letting someone have power over you, and you're going
    to get screwed sooner or later.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201601310">
    <p>FTDI's proprietary driver
    for its USB-to-serial chips has been designed to <a
    href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/10/windows-update-drivers-bricking-usb-serial-chips-beloved-of-hardware-hackers/">sabotage
    alternative compatible chips</a>
    so that they no longer work. Microsoft is <a
    href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/16/01/31/1720259/ftdi-driver-breaks-hardware-again">installing
    this automatically</a> as an “upgrade”.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201511240">
    <p>Windows 10 “upgrades” <a
    href="http://www.ghacks.net/2015/11/24/beware-latest-windows-10-update-may-remove-programs-automatically/">
    delete applications</a> without asking permission.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201503260">
    <p><a
    href="https://www.computerworlduk.com/it-business/windows-xp-end-of-an-era-end-of-an-error-3569489/">Microsoft
    cut off security fixes for Windows XP, except to some big users that
    pay exorbitantly.</a></p> exorbitantly</a>.</p>

    <p>Microsoft is going to <a href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/security/3605515/more-than-half-of-all-ie-users-face-patch-axe-in-10-months/">
    href="https://www.computerworlduk.com/applications/more-than-half-of-all-ie-users-face-patch-axe-in-10-months-3605515/">
    cut off support for some Internet Explorer versions</a> in the same
    way.</p>

    <p>A person or company has the right to cease to work on a particular
    program; the wrong here is Microsoft does this after having made the
    users dependent on Microsoft, because they are not free to ask anyone
    else to work on the program for them.</p></li> them.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201306220">
    <p><a
    href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130622044225/http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2013/06/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again/index.htm">Microsoft
    informs the NSA of bugs in Windows before fixing them</a>.</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<h3 id="interference">Microsoft Interference</h3>

<p>Various proprietary programs often mess up id="subscriptions">Microsoft Subscriptions</h3>

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M201507150">
    <p>Microsoft Office forces users <a
    href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/2948755/windows-apps/office-for-windows-10-will-require-office-365-subscription-on-pcs-larger-tablets.html">to
    subscribe to Office 365 to be able to create/edit documents</a>.</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<h3 id="surveillance">Microsoft Surveillance</h3>

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M201710134">
    <p>Windows 10 telemetry program sends information to Microsoft about
    the user's system. They are like sabotage, but they are not grave enough to qualify computer and their use of the computer.</p>

    <p>Furthermore, for users who installed the word “sabotage”. Nonetheless, they are nasty and wrong. This section describes examples
    fourth stable build of Microsoft committing
interference.</p>

<ul>

<li>In order to increase Windows 10's install base, Microsoft
<a
href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/08/windows-10-microsoft-blatantly-disregards-user-choice-and-privacy-deep-dive">
blatantly disregards user choice and privacy</a>.
</li>

<li><p>Microsoft has
started <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/04/microsoft-windows-10-full-screen-upgrade-notification-pop-up-reminder">nagging
users obnoxiously and repeatedly to install 10, called the
    “Creators Update,” Windows 10</a>.</p></li>

  <li><p>Microsoft
      <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/windows-10-upgrade-reportedly-starting-automatically-on-windows-7-pcs-501651.shtml">is
        tricking
        users</a> maximized the surveillance <a
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160522062607/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/17/microsoft_windows_10_upgrade_gwx_vs_humanity/">
into replacing Windows 7 with Windows 10</a>.</p></li>

  <li><p>Microsoft has made companies' Windows machines managed
    href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/10/dutch-privacy-regulator-says-that-windows-10-breaks-the-law">
    by force setting the
company's
sysadmins <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/3042397/microsoft-windows/admins-beware-domain-attached-pcs-are-sprouting-get-windows-10-ads.html">harangue
users telemetry mode to complain “Full”</a>.</p>

    <p>The <a
    href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/privacy/configure-windows-diagnostic-data-in-your-organization#full-level">
    “Full” telemetry mode</a> allows Microsoft Windows
    engineers to the sysadmins about not “upgrading” access, among other things, registry keys <a
    href="https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc939702.aspx">which
    can contain sensitive information like administrator's login
    password</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201702020">
    <p>DRM-restricted files can be used to Windows
10</a>.</p></li>
</ul>

<h3 id="surveillance">Microsoft Surveillance</h3>

<ul>

<li><p>By <a
    href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/02/02/231229/windows-drm-protected-files-used-to-decloak-tor-browser-users">
    identify people browsing through Tor</a>. The vulnerability exists
    only if you use Windows.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201611240">
    <p>By default, Windows 10 <a
    href="http://betanews.com/2016/11/24/microsoft-shares-windows-10-telemetry-data-with-third-parties">sends
    debugging information to Microsoft, including core dumps</a>. Microsoft
    now distributes them to another company.</p></li>

<li>It company.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201608171">
    <p>In order to increase Windows 10's install base, Microsoft <a class="not-a-duplicate" 
    href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/08/windows-10-microsoft-blatantly-disregards-user-choice-and-privacy-deep-dive">
    blatantly disregards user choice and privacy</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201603170">
    <p><a
    href="https://duo.com/blog/bring-your-own-dilemma-oem-laptops-and-windows-10-security">
    Windows 10 comes with 13 screens of snooping options</a>, all enabled
    by default, and turning them off would be daunting to most users.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201601050">
    <p>It appears <a
    href="http://www.ghacks.net/2016/01/05/microsoft-may-be-collecting-more-data-than-initially-thought/">
    Windows 10 sends data to Microsoft about what applications are 
running</a>.</li>

<li><p>A
    running</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201511264">
    <p>A downgrade to Windows 10 deleted surveillance-detection
    applications.  Then another downgrade inserted a general spying
    program.  Users noticed this and complained, so Microsoft renamed it <a
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160407082751/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/11/26/microsoft_renamed_data_slurper_reinserted_windows_10/">
    href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/11/26/microsoft_renamed_data_slurper_reinserted_windows_10/">
    to give users the impression it was gone</a>.</p>

    <p>To use proprietary software is to invite such treatment.</p></li>

  <li><p>
  <a href="https://duo.com/blog/bring-your-own-dilemma-oem-laptops-and-windows-10-security"> treatment.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201508130">
    <p><a
    href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/08/even-when-told-not-to-windows-10-just-cant-stop-talking-to-microsoft/">
    Windows 10 comes with 13 screens of snooping options</a>, all enabled by default,
  and turning them off would be daunting sends identifiable information to most users.</p></li>

  <li><p>
  Windows Microsoft</a>, even if
    a user turns off its Bing search and Cortana features, and activates
    the privacy-protection settings.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201507300">
    <p>Windows 10 <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151001035410/https://jonathan.porta.codes/2015/07/30/windows-10-seems-to-have-some-scary-privacy-defaults/">
    href="https://jonathan.porta.codes/2015/07/30/windows-10-seems-to-have-some-scary-privacy-defaults/">
    ships with default settings that show no regard for the privacy of
    its users</a>, giving Microsoft the “right” to snoop on
    the users' files, text input, voice input, location info, contacts,
    calendar records and web browsing history, as well as automatically
    connecting the machines to open hotspots and showing targeted ads.</p>

    <p>We can suppose Microsoft look at users' files for the US government
    on demand, though the “privacy policy” does not explicit explicitly
    say so. Will it look at users' files for the Chinese government
    on demand?</p></li>

  <li><p>
  <a href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/08/even-when-told-not-to-windows-10-just-cant-stop-talking-to-microsoft/">
  Windows 10 sends identifiable information to Microsoft</a>, even if a user
  turns off its Bing search and Cortana features, and activates the
  privacy-protection settings.</p></li>

  <li><p>The unique “advertising ID” for each user enables other companies to
  track the browsing of each specific user.</p></li>

  <li>Spyware in Windows 8: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160313105805/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/02/28/windows_update_keeps_tabs/">
  Windows Update snoops on the user.</a>
  <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/look-the-black-underbelly-of-windows-81-blue-222175">
  Windows 8.1 snoops on local searches.</a> And there's a
  <a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article40836.html">
  secret NSA key in Windows</a>, whose functions we don't know.</li>

  <li><p>
  <a href="http://www.itproportal.com/2014/05/14/microsoft-openly-offered-cloud-data-fbi-and-nsa/">
  Microsoft SkyDrive allows the NSA to directly examine users' data.</a></p>
  </li>

  <li><p>Spyware in Skype:
      <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2013/06/20/project-chess-how-u-s-snoops-on-your-skype/">
      http://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2013/06/20/project-chess-how-u-s-snoops-on-your-skype/</a>.
      Microsoft changed Skype
      <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data">
      specifically for spying</a>.</p> demand?</p>
  </li>

  <li><p>
  Microsoft

  <li id="M201506170">
    <p>Microsoft uses Windows 10's “privacy policy”
    to overtly impose a “right” to look at
    users' files at any time. Windows 10 full disk encryption <a
    href="https://edri.org/microsofts-new-small-print-how-your-personal-data-abused/">
    gives Microsoft a key</a>.</p>

    <p>Thus, Windows is overt malware in regard to surveillance, as in
    other issues.</p>

    <p>We can suppose Microsoft look at users' files for the US government
    on demand, though the “privacy policy” does not explicit
    say so. Will it look at users' files for the Chinese government
    on demand?</p>

    <p>The unique “advertising ID” for each user enables
    other companies to track the browsing of each specific user.</p>

    <p>It's as if Microsoft has deliberately chosen to make Windows 10
    maximally evil on every dimension; to make a grab for total power
    over anyone that doesn't drop Windows now.</p></li>

</ul>

<h3 id="drm">Microsoft DRM</h3>
<ul>
  <li><p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/2007/08/aacs-tentacles/">
  DRM (digital restrictions mechanisms) in Windows</a>, introduced now.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201410040">
    <p>It only gets worse with time.  <a
    href="http://www.techworm.net/2014/10/microsofts-windows-10-permission-watch-every-move.html">
    Windows 10 requires users to
  cater give permission for total snooping</a>,
    including their files, their commands, their text input, and their
    voice input.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201405140">
    <p><a
    href="http://www.itproportal.com/2014/05/14/microsoft-openly-offered-cloud-data-fbi-and-nsa/">
    Microsoft SkyDrive allows the NSA to directly examine users'
    data</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201307110">
    <p>Skype contains <a href="/proprietary/proprietary-drm.html#bluray">Bluray</a> disks.
  (The article also talks about how
    href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130928235637/http://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2013/06/20/project-chess-how-u-s-snoops-on-your-skype/">spyware</a>.
    Microsoft changed Skype <a
    href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data">
    specifically for spying</a>.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201307080">
    <p>Spyware in older versions of Windows: <a
    href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/02/28/windows_update_keeps_tabs/">
    Windows Update snoops on the same malware would later be introduced user</a>. <a
    href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2611451/microsoft-windows/a-look-at-the-black-underbelly-of-windows-8-1--blue-.html">
    Windows 8.1 snoops on local searches</a>. And there's a <a
    href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article40836.html"> secret NSA
    key in MacOS.)</p></li> Windows</a>, whose functions we don't know.</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<h3 id="jails">Microsoft Jails</h3>
<ul>
  <li><p><a href="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/301057/microsoft-metro-app-store-lockdown">

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M201706130">
    <p>Windows 10 S was a jail: <a
    href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/03/windows-10-s-microsoft-faster-pc-comparison">
    only programs from the Windows Store could be
    installed and executed</a>. It was however possible to <a
    href="https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/13/15789998/microsoft-windows-10-s-upgrade-windows-10-pro-guide">
    upgrade to Windows 10 Pro</a>. The successor of Windows
    10 S is a special configuration of Windows 10 called <a
    href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/4020089/windows-10-in-s-mode-faq">
    S mode</a>. The major difference with Windows 10 S is that there is
    an easy way to switch out of S mode.</p>
  </li>

  <li id="M201210080">
    <p><a
    href="http://www.itworld.com/article/2832657/operating-systems/microsoft-metro-app-store-lock-down.html">
    Windows 8 on “mobile devices” is (now defunct) was a jail</a>: it censors the
  user's choice of application programs.</p></li>
    jail</a>.</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<h3 id="tyrants">Microsoft Tyrants</h3>
<ul>
<li>

<ul class="blurbs">
  <li id="M201607150">
    <p>Microsoft accidentally left a way for users
    to install GNU/Linux on Windows RT tablets, but now it has <a
    href="http://www.securitynewspaper.com/2016/07/15/microsoft-silently-kills-dev-backdoor-boots-linux-locked-windows-rt-slabs/">
    “fixed” the “error”</a>. Those arrogant
bastards They have the gall
    to call this “protecting” the users.  The article talks
    of installing “Linux”, but the context shows it is really
    <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux</a> that users
install.
</p> install.</p>
  </li>
  <li><p><a href="http://fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/">

  <li id="M201110110">
    <p><a href="https://fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/">
    Mobile devices that come with Windows 8 are tyrants</a>: they block
  users from installing other or modified operating systems.</p></li> tyrants</a>.</p>
  </li>
</ul>


<p>As this page shows, if you do want to clean your computer of malware,
the first software to delete is Windows.</p>

</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
<div class="unprintable">

<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p>

<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
        replace it with the translation of these two:

        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
        to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
        <web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p>

        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
        our web pages, see <a
        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
        README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>
</div>

<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
     document was modified, or published.

     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).

     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->

<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016 2016, 2017, 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>

<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative
Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.</p>

<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->

<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2018/10/27 08:28:53 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>