<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 1.96 -->
<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays cultural drm" -->
<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
<title>Nonfree DRM'd Games on GNU/Linux: Good or Bad?
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/nonfree-games.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Nonfree DRM'd Games on GNU/Linux: Good or Bad?</h2>


<address class="byline">by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a></p> href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard

<p>A well known company, Valve, that distributes nonfree computer games
with Digital Restrictions Management, recently announced it would
distribute these games for GNU/Linux.  What good and bad effects can
this have?</p>

<p>I suppose that availability of popular nonfree programs on
the GNU/Linux system can boost adoption of the system.  However, the aim of GNU
goes beyond “success”; its purpose is
to <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"> bring
freedom to the users </a>.  Thus, the larger question is how this
development affects users' freedom.</p>

<p>The problem with these games
is not that <a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Commercial"> they are
commercial</a>.  (We see nothing wrong with that.)  It
is not that <a href="/philosophy/selling.html"> the developers
sell copies</a>; that's not wrong either.  The problem is that the
games contain software that is
<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">not free</a>
(free in the sense of freedom, of course).</p>

<p>Nonfree game programs (like other nonfree programs) are unethical
because they deny freedom to their users.  (Game art is a different
issue, because
it isn't software.) <a href="/philosophy/copyright-versus-community.html">isn't
software</a>.)  If you want freedom, one requisite for it is not
having or running nonfree programs on your computer.  That much is

<p>However, if you're going to use these games, you're better off using
them on GNU/Linux rather than on Microsoft Windows.  At least you avoid
<a href="http://upgradefromwindows8.org/">the href="https://www.fsf.org/windows">the harm to your freedom that Windows
would do</a>.</p>

<p>Thus, in direct practical terms, this development can do both harm
and good.  It might encourage GNU/Linux users to install these games,
and it might encourage users of the games to replace Windows with
GNU/Linux.  My guess is that the direct good effect will be bigger than
the direct harm.  But there is also an indirect effect: what does the
use of these games teach people in our community?</p>

<p>Any GNU/Linux distro that comes with software to offer these games
will teach users that the point is not freedom.  <a
href="/distros/common-distros.html">Nonfree software in GNU/Linux
distros</a> already works against the goal of freedom.  Adding these
games to a distro would augment that effect.</p>

<p>Free software is a matter of freedom, not price.  A free game need
not be gratis.  It is feasible to develop free games commercially,
while respecting your freedom to change the software you use.  Since
the art in the game is not software, it is not ethically imperative to
make the art free — though free—though free art is an additional
contribution.  There is in fact free game software developed by
companies, as well as free games developed noncommercially by
volunteers.  Crowdfunding development will only get easier.</p>

<p>But if we suppose that it is <em>not feasible</em> in the current
situation to develop a certain
kind of free game — what game—what would follow then?  There's no good in
writing it as a nonfree game.  To have freedom in your computing,
requires rejecting nonfree software, pure and simple.
You as a freedom-lover won't use the nonfree game if it exists, so
you won't lose anything if it does not exist.</p>

<p>If you want to promote the cause of freedom in computing, please
take care not to talk about the availability of these games on
GNU/Linux as support for our cause.  Instead you could tell people
about the <a href="https://libregamewiki.org/Main_Page">libre games
wiki</a> that attempts to catalog free
games, <a href="http://forum.freegamedev.net/index.php"> href="https://forum.freegamedev.net/index.php"> the Free Game
Dev Forum</a>, and the LibrePlanet Gaming
Collective's <a href="http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:LibrePlanet_Gaming_Collective"> href="https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:LibrePlanet_Gaming_Collective">
free gaming night.</a> </p>


<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20191125215630/http://onpon4.github.io/articles/gaming-trap.html">
Watch out for
“nonfree game data” that actually contains software.</a></p>

</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer"> id="footer" role="contentinfo">
<div class="unprintable">

<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p>

<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
        replace it with the translation of these two:

        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
        to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">

        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting contributing translations of
        our web pages, see <a
        README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting contributing translations
of this article.</p>

<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
     document was modified, or published.
     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->

<p>Copyright © 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016 2016, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>

<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>

<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->

<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2021/09/30 09:32:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->