... times over nearly ten years, without ever going to court.</p> <p>Meanwhile, much murmuring has been going o ... he absence of judicial enforcement, in US or other courts, somehow demonstrates that there is something wro ... ch authors the license, is afraid of testing it in court. Precisely the reverse is true. We do not find our ... selves taking the GPL to court because no one has yet been willing to risk contes ... ... times over nearly ten years, without ever going to court.</p> <p>Meanwhile, much murmuring has been going o ... he absence of judicial enforcement, in US or other courts, somehow demonstrates that there is something wro ... ch authors the license, is afraid of testing it in court. Precisely the reverse is true. We do not find our ... selves taking the GPL to court because no one has yet been willing to risk contes ... ... times over nearly ten years, without ever going to court.</p> <p>Meanwhile, much murmuring has been going o ... he absence of judicial enforcement, in US or other courts, somehow demonstrates that there is something wro ... ch authors the license, is afraid of testing it in court. Precisely the reverse is true. We do not find our ... selves taking the GPL to court because no one has yet been willing to risk contes ... ... times over nearly ten years, without ever going to court.</p> <p>Meanwhile, much murmuring has been going o ... he absence of judicial enforcement, in US or other courts, somehow demonstrates that there is something wro ... ch authors the license, is afraid of testing it in court. Precisely the reverse is true. We do not find our ... selves taking the GPL to court because no one has yet been willing to risk contes ... ... Communications Decency Act, which the U.S. Supreme Court found unconstitutional on June 26, 1997. Their sit ... /http://www.vtw.org/speech/">the June 1996 appeals court decision</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived Dece ... decision is <em>not</em> final! First, the Supreme Court will agree or disagree; then Congress gets a chanc ... ... Communications Decency Act, which the U.S. Supreme Court found unconstitutional on June 26, 1997. Their sit ... /http://www.vtw.org/speech/">the June 1996 appeals court decision</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived Dece ... decision is <em>not</em> final! First, the Supreme Court will agree or disagree; then Congress gets a chanc ... ... Communications Decency Act, which the U.S. Supreme Court found unconstitutional on June 26, 1997. Their sit ... /http://www.vtw.org/speech/">the June 1996 appeals court decision</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived Dece ... decision is <em>not</em> final! First, the Supreme Court will agree or disagree; then Congress gets a chanc ... ... Communications Decency Act, which the U.S. Supreme Court found unconstitutional on June 26, 1997. Their sit ... /http://www.vtw.org/speech/">the June 1996 appeals court decision</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived Dece ... decision is <em>not</em> final! First, the Supreme Court will agree or disagree; then Congress gets a chanc ... ... Communications Decency Act, which the U.S. Supreme Court found unconstitutional on June 26, 1997. Their sit ... /http://www.vtw.org/speech/">the June 1996 appeals court decision</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived Dece ... decision is <em>not</em> final! First, the Supreme Court will agree or disagree; then Congress gets a chanc ... ... Communications Decency Act, which the U.S. Supreme Court found unconstitutional on June 26, 1997. Their sit ... /http://www.vtw.org/speech/">the June 1996 appeals court decision</a> at the Wayback Machine (archived Dece ... decision is <em>not</em> final! First, the Supreme Court will agree or disagree; then Congress gets a chanc ...